Statists and Total Dependency

Texas Health Insurance Plans - Statists and Total Dependency

Good morning. Yesterday, I discovered Texas Health Insurance Plans - Statists and Total Dependency. Which is very helpful for me and also you. Statists and Total Dependency

Americans have all the time seen themselves as independent and self-sufficient. The spirit of this nation has fostered the view that any American, willing to work hard and take some risk, could strive to accomplish any hereafter he wanted, together with the Presidency of the United States. It's a lively photograph but if it did ever exist, it is rapidly fading. We have gone from the many creditor nation to the many debtor nation. We have gone from superpower to supplicant. We are deteriorating from a nation of rugged individuals to a nation of dependents.

What I said. It isn't in conclusion that the real about Texas Health Insurance Plans. You see this article for information about a person need to know is Texas Health Insurance Plans.

Texas Health Insurance Plans

The big government statists have convinced most of the American population that our country's greatness stems not from the qualities of its population but from the largess of its government. As the communist world falls apart and searches for ways to embrace capitalism and the free market, America is in the process of development its population as dependent on government as the worst of the socialist nations.

The old-time American idea that every personel is responsible for protecting himself, his family and his property has been replaced with government in case,granted police military and self-styled advocates who can only act after a crime has been committed and whose role seems to be preventing personel performance rather than supporting it. We have the ridiculous situation in which the victim of a crime may be punished more severely than the perpetrator because he has violated some rule or regulation designed to protect the "rights" of the criminal.

The government is buying up huge tracts of land to "protect" it from the predation of its own citizens. It wants to found a cradle to grave health task to look after healing dependence. It intrudes deeper into the instruction system each day in order to brainwash American children into believing that they cannot exist without the "nanny" government. Anyone who has trouble walking or talking or finding or hearing or quitting booze or drugs or any of a vast panoply of ailments is made dependent for his survival on the government.

Communism was the great purveyor of the understanding of dependency because it was principal for the government to control the population from top to lowest and the easiest way to make person obedient is to make them dependent. If the population have to look to the government for food, clothing, shelter, healing care, relinquishment benefits, instruction and personal protection the government effectively controls their lives. All the rulers need do is retain those things to convince all but the most individualistic to toe the mark. Of policy it is also principal for the government to preclude Anyone else from providing those services or their monopoly falls apart and the population will look elsewhere. The U. S. Postal service is a prime example.

It is clear that social protection is also that kind of monopoly. Despite the dismal return on venture and the example of flourishing relinquishment systems face of social protection the government insists that 100% participation is principal to insure success. It also insures dependency on government of a large segment of the population.

In the early 1980's it was inherent for safe bet non-federal government agencies to opt out of social protection and found their own relinquishment plan. The county government of Galveston, Texas was among the agencies that took benefit of this Foggy lowest mental lapse and has advanced a system that is so classic to social protection that many participants will end their careers with a relinquishment cost that exceeds their previous salary. They will also have a principal death benefit that goes to their estate as opposed to the two hundred fifty-five dollars that a few population will receive from the S/S system. In fact, the program is so good that the Feds are trying to force its closure and make its participants go back to social Security. Sadly it was only a few years before the Federal government realized its error and complete the loophole and once again, the social protection system became the only game in town.

We continue to have most of our social utilities controlled by government supported monopolies despite the fact that the economic and cultural conditions that spawned those monopolies have long since vanished. Even when the monopolies are broken up the government keeps its finger on the button so that free market military are never allowed to prevail.

There may have been some perceived presume for monopoly protection of utilities in the early days of galvanic grids, natural gas distribution, telephone service and the like. The investments involved were huge and the uncertainty of the outcome made them a very risky enterprise. But that doesn't elucidate why, after decades of use and becoming a part of every day life, the government continues to keep control.

When the Federal Communications Commission emerged, radio transmitters were huge, power sucking monsters and the frequency discrimination was so poor that it was believed that there would only be one or two stations in every market. With this in mind the philosophy of broadcasting "in the social interest" was formed to try to insure that the airwaves would never be controlled by monolithic vested interests. Can that present to today's world where powerful, inexpensive transmitters are comparatively tiny, directional antennas are ready and advertising revenues retain most stations? Why does the Fcc continue to regulate broadcasting when technology exists to separate stations and preclude interference? It can only be because the government refuses to give up the power to influence mass communications.

In case you think that government no longer seeks to impose and control monopolies, peruse the cable television industry. There was never a good presume for government to get involved in restricting cable providers but they just couldn't resist. Anyone who complains about the size of their cable bill and the lousy service they get can thank the government agencies that prevented competition in the industry.

In 2001 California's Democrat dominated government tried to sneak some modification of the utility monopoly status quo, thinly disguised as "deregulation," into electricity production. In fact it only deregulated the buy price of power from suppliers and not the price paid by consumers. When the predictable disaster occurred they then crowed happily about how it proved that the "free market" approach doesn't work. Unfortunately, the Republicans were too impotent to even argue the point and so the statists were able to gift the failure as an indictment of all deregulation.

Despite attempts at "deregulation" the U.S. Communication system remains very monopolistic. Governments build the roads, airports, port facilities and even the railroad tracks. There is no entrepreneurial spirit, no competition to force convert to new technology, no incentive to heighten because bureaucracy has no interest in the hereafter except as it applies to government funding.

The Ada (Americans With Disabilities Act) has created a whole cottage industry of attempting to make every disabled person, regardless of handicap, able to do everything that can be done by every other person. Those with disability are no longer encouraged to make exceptional efforts to overcome their situation, instead the "Great Nanny" government steps in and tries to equalize everything, normally by dragging down those without disability rather than attempting the much more difficult task of raising those with handicaps.

"Political Correctness" is a socialist effort to destroy the First Amendment by invoking the protection of some helpless minority as a presume to restrain free speech. A subset is the new affection for inveighing against the so-called "hate crimes." What is de facto sought is an ability for the government to demonize unpopular opinion. The whole movement is an effort to allow an offended person to use the power of government to silence the offender.

The once solid fortress of free speech, the college campus, has become a cesspool of groups whose only presume for existence is to insure that no speech reflecting unpopular (by pupil or faculty standards) understanding ever sees the light of day. Socialist/statist professors are allowed to make the most outrageous statements with impunity while those in opposition are effectively muzzled.

This kind of collectivist mental could never have produced a nation like the United States but it may well destroy it. We will soon reach the point where the lowest fifty-plus percent of workers will pay No wage taxes (they pay less than four percent today). Once that is achieved the statists will have permanent control of this nation because they will be able to apply Marxist wealth distribution with impunity. They will be taking tax money from the flourishing minority and giving it to the unsuccessful majority. The class war will then be over, the dependent class will have won.

© 2005 Charles Stone, Jr.

I hope you will get new knowledge about Texas Health Insurance Plans. Where you may offer use in your life. And most significantly, your reaction is passed about Texas Health Insurance Plans.